![]() |
Recently, Angelopoulos et al [2008] studied timing and the causal relationship in the substorm that occurred at ~04:55 UT on February 26, 2008. They concluded that the substorm was likely initiated by mid-tail reconnection. On the other hand, Lui [2009] provided evidence that near-Earth current disruption, occurring before the conventional tail reconnection signature (i.e., the convection flow), triggered the onset.
There were two substorms on February 26, 2008 with expansion phase onsets at about 04:05 UT and 04:55 UT, respectively. This paper presents further studies of the two substorms. The measurements of bi-directional anisotropy of energetic electrons indicate that midtail reconnection clearly occurred ahead of auroral signatures of both substorms. The pseudobreakups appeared about 1-2 min immediately after the reconnection onsets, while the expansion phase onsets occurred within about one min when earthward flows arrived at the near-Earth tail.
Observations--Overview
Figure 1 shows a 3-D view of THEMIS spacecraft positions at ~04:00 UT with the projection onto the X-Z plane in the GSM coordinates. Figure 2 shows the overview of the events. It is seen that two sets of substorm activities occurred separately with dipolarization/expansions at ~04:05 and ~04:55 UT, respectively. Figure 3(a) shows the overview of THEMIS measurements. Figure 3(b) shows the measurements of P1, P2, P3 and P4 during the 10 minute interval from 03:57:00 UT to 04:07:00 UT.
A localized auroral arc started to intensify at 04:00:21 UT. A second, stronger auroral intensification began at 04:03:30 UT, followed by rapid poleward expansion at 04:04:30 UT. Figure 4 illustrates the auroral arcs at SNKQ and GILL at five selected times: 04:00:09 UT (before the initial intensification), 04:00:33 UT (after the initial intensification), 04:01:42 UT (after the first/local expansion), 04:03:42 UT (after the major intensification), and 04:05:15 UT (after the major expansion). Meanwhile, in the near-Earth tail, earthward flow was first detected by P4 at X = -9.8 RE at 04:04:16 UT, followed by magnetic dipolarization at 04:04:48 UT. P3 at X= -10.6 RE observed the flow arrival at 04:04:48 UT and dipolarization at 04:04:51 UT. Note that both the near-Earth onsets of dipolarization and earthward flows occurred nearly simultaneously with the major auroral intensification/expansion within about one minute. Furthermore, in the mid-tail, a tailward flow of ~300 km/s with negative Bz started at 03:58:27 UT at P1 location (X= -21.9 RE). Beginning at 04:05:16 UT, the flow became earthward with positive Bz. During the reversal of Vx and Bz, Bx remained negative, while By changed from positive to negative. These observations are in agreement with the fact that the spacecraft was encountering the Hall-quadrupole magnetic field and crossing the reconnection region from the tailward side to the earthward side.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Figure 4. Auroral brightening of the ~04:05 UT substorm at SNKQ (right) and GILL at five selected times (left to right): 04:00:09 UT, 04:00:33 UT, 04:01:42 UT, 04:03:42 UT and 04:05:15 UT. |
Click each image to enlarge. |
When a spacecraft encounters the reconnection region, it sees field-aligned accelerated electrons flowing out near the separatrix [Nagai et al., 2001]. The associated electron bidirectional anisotropy has been regarded as a good indicator for in situ reconnection observations. Figure 5(a) shows the first observation of a weak electron bidirectional anisotropy averaging from 03:58:34 to 03:58:37 UT. Figure 5(b) and 5(c) show more pronounced anisotropies as P1 was in the tailward outflow region not far from the separatrix and when P1 had moved into the earthward outflow region near the separatrix, respectively. It is seen in Figure 5(b) that higher-energy (200-4000 eV) electrons were streaming mostly tailward (PA~0o) with a higher flux, while lower-energy (10-100 eV) electrons were flowing mostly earthward (PA~180o) with a lower flux. On the other hand, the situation in Figure 5(c) is just opposite. These measurements strongly suggest that P1 did observe the tailward retreating reconnection region and that reconnection occurred before 03:58:34 UT, which is about two minute ahead of the first auroral signature (pseudobreakup).
Click each image to enlarge. |
It is also of interest to note that the polar cap flux Ψ started to rapidly decrease at ~04:07 UT, indicating that tail reconnection had already progressed from closed plasma sheet field lines to the lobe open field lines before that time.
The Second Substorm
The electron bidirectional anisotropy of collisionless reconnection was observed by P1 at 04:50:28 UT; later, P2 also observed this reconnection signature at 04:50:38 UT. The first/localized auroral intensification occurred at 04:51:39 UT at GILL. P3 saw earthward flow at 04:52:27 UT and dipolarization at 04:53:05 UT. The all-sky imager at SNKQ observed the second stronger intensification at 04:53:03 UT and subsequent extensive expansion at 04:53:48 UT. Ψ started to decrease at ~04:55 UT. Figure 6 shows the auroral activities at SNKQ and GILL at five selected times: 04:51:24 UT (before the initial intensification), 04:51:51 UT (after the initial intensification), 04:52:42 UT (after the first/limited expansion), 04:53:15 UT (after the major intensification) and 04:54:54 UT (after the major expansion). Apparently, the timing feature of the second substorm is similar to the first one.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Figure 6. Auroral activities of the ~04:55 UT substorm at SNKQ (right) and GILL (left) at five selected times: 04:51:24 UT, 04:51:51 UT, 04:52:42 UT, 04:53:15 UT and 04:54:54UT. |
Click each image to enlarge. |
Angelopoulos et al [2008] have shown the time history of the second substorm activities. Substorm timings for the first event are summarized in Table 1.
Event | Observed Time (UT) | Time delay (seconds) |
Start of tailward flow with Bz < 0 at P1 | 03:58:29 | |
Reconnection effects (electron-Hall) at P1 | 03:58:34 | 0 |
First auroral intensification | 04:00:21 | 107 |
First auroral expansion onset | 04:01:21 | 167 |
High latitude Pi2 onset at GILL | ~04:02 | ~206 |
Second (major) auroral intensification | 04:03:30 | 296 | Earthward flow onset at P4 | 04:04:16 | 342 |
Earthward flow onset at P3 | 04:04:48 | 374 |
Second (major) auroral expansion onset | 04:04:30 | 356 |
Negative H-excursion at RANK | 04:04:30 | 356 |
Rapid increase of THEMIS AE | 04:04:30 | 356 |
Dipolarization at P4 | 04:04:48 | 374 |
Dipolarization at P3 | 04:04:51 | 377 |
Enhancement of westward electrojet current Jw | ~04:05 | ~386 |
Mid-latitude Pi2 onset at FYTS | ~04:06 | ~446 |
Rapid decrease of polar cap flux Ψ | ~04:07 | ~506 |
Discussions & Conclusions
Two substorms possess three common features in time history. First, the initial auroral brightening appeared around two minutes immediately after mid-tail reconnection. It is thus likely that mid-tail reconnection directly initiated (possibly through the related kinetic Alfven waves and their accelerated electrons) the initial auroral brightening. Secondly, the expansion phase onsets (the major auroral intensification followed by extensive expansion and near-Earth dipolarization) occurred within about one minute when earthward flows were observed in the near-Earth tail. This appears to be in agreement with the scenario that the earthward flows caused by mid-tail reconnection transport energy to eventually cause the near-Earth substorm expansion onset. Thirdly, the open flux Ψ rapidly decreased soon after the major expansion onset. This is in accordance with the idea that the major onset of the expansion phase is closely related to reconnection of lobe open field lines which provides most energy dissipated during the expansion phase.
References
Angelopoulos, V. et al. (2008), Tail Reconnection Triggering Substorm Onset, Science, Vol. 321 no. 5891, pp.
931-935, DOI: 10:1126/science.1160495.
Lui, A.T.Y. (2009), Comment on "Tail Reconnection Triggering Substorm Onset," Science, 324, doi:412 10.1026/science.1167726.
Nagai, T. et al. (2001), Geotail observations of the Hall current system: Evidence of magnetic reconnection in the magnetotail,
J. Geophys. Res., 106(A11), 25929-25949.
Biographical Note
Zuyin Pu is a professor in the School of Earth and Space Sciences at Peking University in Beijing, China. His current research interest focuses on substorm dynamics and reconnection in magnetospheric plasmas. Xiangning Chu is a former student of Zuyin Pu at Peking University. Now he is a Ph.D student at the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics (IGPP) at UCLA. Xing Cao is a postdoctoral researcher in the School of Physics at Peking University, working with Zuyin Pu. Vilen Mishin is a senior professor in the Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics at the Russian Academny of Sciences in Irkutsk, Russia. He developed the magnetorgram inversion technique (MIT) to study substorms. He is one of the first scientists to posit that closed plasma sheet reconnection leads to the initial substorm onset, while open tail reconnection causes the full expansion onset. Vassilis Angelopoulos is the PI of the THEMIS mission.